ylq123
Joined: 07 Jul 2018 Posts: 53
|
Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 7:16 am Post subject: and enter the customs. But why did it fail in |
|
|
Recently read many articles by ancient literati, and found that the ancients are "old". Many scholars and scholars like to express their own opinions on historical events. Confucius said: "I am not a sage, so good, even those who are looking for Miner." It seems that the ancients have a heated discussion about "ancient", but I would like to think that historical theory is only a "Realistic idealism" is a bit of a paper-based testimony of Su Zhe's "Six Kingdoms". Ziyou believes that the people of the six kingdoms were so diligent that they died. He pointed out that the six countries, China and South Korea, and Wei are close to Qin, and the geographical location is very important: "Korean and Wei seize Qin and cover the princes of Shandong." Six countries should unite as one and assist Han and Wei to stop Qin. But in my personal opinion, this statement has three common contradictions in historical theory: First, Su Zhe is looking at history from the perspective of posterity, which raises a question: But who knows how Qin Congress unified the world? It's like going to the Chinese test alone [url=http://www.cigarettesusaonline.com/]Wholesale Cigarettes[/url], waiting for the curls to come down, not reading well, not being able to regret it, and then talking about how I should understand at the time. In fact, if you spent more time reading, you might not be able to finish the next composition. If he did what Qin said, he might have ruled Chu, and then Su Zhe wrote a "New Six Kingdoms" to discuss how Qin and five other countries deal with Chu. This is the first major contradiction in historical theory-the contradiction in time. Have. Su Qin relied on his own strength to complete the integration of the six kingdoms, and attacked Qin together, forcing Qin to abandon the land and enter the customs. But why did it fail in the end? Please note that six countries are six countries, not six provinces of one country. They have their own hearts, as long as their own interests are gone, they immediately roll away. Su Zhe wanted the six nations to resist the Qin for a long time. This is to allow the trend of history to develop according to his wishful thinking, which is too idealistic, so the second major contradiction in historical theory is the ideal contradiction.
Yu Shiguo helped secretly. If you are the emperor of Han and Wei, instead of sacrificing the territorial integrity of your country, let the four kingdoms have the gold sacrifice; if you lay down your life to attack Qin, but let the four nations live and work in peace, you might as well go to Qin and enjoy the Qin kingdom. This is the third major contradiction in historical theory, and it is the contradiction of motivation that allows individuals and organizations to do things that are not in their interests. To sum up, it can be seen that there is a great distance between the so-called "history theory" and history, and it is even contradictory at all. There are also many personal historical theories, such as "Yurang Theory", which considers that Yurang attached to the assassin's assassination plot after Zhao Zhigong's assassination was not an act of righteousness [url=http://www.salesmoking.com/]Parliament Cigarettes[/url]. Sang with death. There is also "Lang Xiangru Completed Returning to Zhao Zhao", saying that Xiang Xiangru Completed Returning to Zhao is luck, and also returned reason to Qin Guo ... These historical views are unconventional and unreasonable [url=http://www.cigarettesusaonline.com/marlboro-gold-online_c4]Marlboro Gold[/url], but looking at one person is too one-sided and only studies from a single historical event . Ma Qian of Taishi Company said: "When we study the heavens and the people, the changes of ancient times and modern times become the words of a family." There is nothing wrong with it. However, I personally think that the role of history is not in history itself, nor is it used to innovate and show its own views. The most important thing is to see the past through history and not to repeat the same mistakes as history. "Taking lessons from the past, we can learn and replace." Therefore, only the historical theory linked to reality is most meaningful and valuable.
Related articles:
[url=http://www.lizards.cz/forum/viewtopic.php?p=415125#415125]Newport Cigarettes[/url]
[url=http://forum.all-small-dogs.ru/index.php?topic=6505.0]Cigarettes Online[/url] |
|