Anti-Spam Discussion Forums
Click here to go back to the main SpamItBack Website
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The NFC East flat blew up at the trade deadline

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Anti-Spam Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Joined: 10 Dec 2018
Posts: 76
Location: NYC

PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2019 3:43 am    Post subject: The NFC East flat blew up at the trade deadline Reply with quote

with each team making significant moves:The general consensus is Dallas [url=]Tony Romo Jersey[/url] , Philadelphia and Washington all improved their 2018 chances, but long-term events will decide the value of these trades. ESPN named each a trade dealine “winner” (with the Giants a loser): Based upon Twitter and the comments on our own BTB site many Cowboys fans don’t share the same optimism regarding the acquisition of Pro Bowl wide-out Amari Cooper.After, all, they’ve seen this play before and past outcomes have left many with legitimate concerns. There’s also, however, legitimate reason for optimism. A look at how the Cowboys’ passing game has performed in 2018 - and how Cooper could fit in - shows there was logic in the front-office’s decision-making. The following bubble chart of the team’s top receiving targets shows three data points:Horizontal axis shows receiving yards. Vertical axis shows yards per attempt.Bubble size indicates number of targets.In general, this is an ugly chart. Only Beasley and “others” occupy the area you want to occupy. The others either suffer from a poor yards per target number (one of the best measurements of a passing attack) or their receiving yards are minuscule. When your second most prolific receiver in terms of yards gained is on pace for less than 500 yards - and your top receiver is pace for 800 yards - there are major problems. That’s where Cooper could - and should - come in. Let’s add his 2018 numbers to the chart:This looks a little better. You don’t have to squint too hard to see the makings of a legitimate NFL receiving corps: Beasley, Cooper, Gallup, Swaim. I’ll be surprised if this doesn’t become the consistent group in terms of snaps and targets. This makes sense if you look at targets (volume) and yards per attempt (efficiency):This clearly shows how Beasley, Swaim and Gallup have been productive and the rest of the team not so much. These problems also show up:Elliott is getting far too many targets. The schemed throws to Elliott are fine (think the screens that have proven deadly and the late game catch against the Lions). However, Elliott is frequently targeted as a last-ditch outlet on third-and-long, getting the ball near the line of scrimmage and asked to make 8-15 yards. These are killing his efficiency numbers. Allen Hurns has been a complete bust and shouldn’t be on the field much moving forward. The “others” benefit from a few big plays by Tavon Auston and Rico Gathers but there’s been no consistency from any of the individual players. Let’s look at the same chart, with Cooper added:Here we see how Cooper slots in well with the Cowboys’ other productive targets. Cooper has been averaging less than five targets per game with the Raiders. Considering his elite route-running skills, Cooper is likely to average more with the Cowboys. Those targets should come at the expense of Hurns and Elliott. Specifically, Hurns isn’t going to be on the field. But more importantly, the expectation is that Cooper will provide the open receiver on those long third down plays where Dak Prescott is currently dropping the ball off to Elliott. If that happens, Elliott’s targets should decline and his efficiency should improve. Again, it’s not hard to envision the Beasley/Cooper/Gallup/Swaim/Elliott group being much, much more effective on third downs. This would be a huge improvement as Dallas currently ranks 29th in the NFL with a third-down conversion rate of only 31.2%. This is a huge drop from 2016 when the team ranked ninth at 43%. If Cooper can help them team convert one more third down out of every ten attempts, suddenly the team is back in that top ten level. That doesn’t seem an outrageous expectation. Let’s put all this in perspective by looking at Dak Prescott’s numbers.Here’s his performance for 2016, 2017 and 2018 compared to the NFL’s 2018 average:One thing that’s hard to see is that Dak’s bubbles are just smaller than the NFL average. In 2018, Dak is averaging 29 attempts per game, seven less than the NFL average (36). At seven yards per attempt that means we would expect Dak to be throwing for 50 yards less per game than the NFL average. And that’s right where Dak stands (208 yards per game versus 253 yards per game). That’s because Dak’s yards per attempt is almost identical to the league average (6.8 versus 7.0). You can also see Dak’s 2018 is about the same as his 2017, but significantly worse than his 2016. Again, you don’t have to squint too hard to imagine Dak’s 2018 number migrating towards that 2016 mark with the addition of Cooper. Convert a few more first downs per game to keep a few drives alive and much of what ails this Cowboys offense would be fixed. That’s the hope anyway. It may not prove successful. But when you look at all the various parts and where there’s room for improvement [url=]Jamize Olawale Color Rush Jersey[/url] , Cooper sure seems like a well-thought out solution to the Cowboys’ offensive problems. So, one of the objectives of the Cowboys’ offense moving into the 2018 season was to integrate Ezekiel Elliott into the team’s passing game. This took on greater importance when the team’s offseason moves at the wide receiver and tight end positions were less than successful. Early returns were not promising as Zeke seemed no more involved in the passing game than he had been in the past. But since the acquisition of Amari Cooper, Elliott’s receiving numbers have increased dramatically:We see the Cowboys did in fact start throwing the ball to Zeke more in 2018. So the team was trying, it’s just that they were failing as we see in the following:Dallas was throwing the ball to Zeke more before Cooper arrived, but they were generating the same number of yards as in past years. In short, more targets, a lower catch percentage and fewer yards per catch. Since Cooper’s arrival, however, Zeke’s numbers have skyrocketed:3.0 more targets per game (88% increase)3.1 more catches per game (124% increase)26 more receiving yards per game (108% increase)Here are his numbers in table form:We also see that despite more targets the passing plays involving Zeke are more efficient:15-point increase in catch percentage (73% to 88%)Yards per target has increased from 7.1 to 7.8 (10% increase)We also see Elliott’s receiving touchdown numbers have increased, but the sample numbers are so small I wouldn’t put a lot of faith in those numbers. Still, it’s comforting that his TDs have increased along with his targets, catches, catch percentage and yards. Let’s see how Elliott’s increased role in the passing game has affected his role in the running game. The following charts use rolling 5-game averages to see if there’s been any effect. We see that Elliott’s rushing attempts are in line with his career history, but below what he was asked to do towards his final games in 2017. Elliott’s rushing yards are similar - not as high as early in his career (when the Cowboys had an elite offensive line) but fairly consistent with what he’s done throughout his career. In short, his increased role in the passing game hasn’t cannibalized his production in the running game. More importantly, the rolling averages show his dramatically increased role in the passing game. If you add both Elliott’s rushing and receiving numbers together we get the following:This is a really interesting image:Elliott was most productive early, reaching a career high of 810 combined yards in only his seventhth game. After reaching more than 150 combined yards per game Elliott’s numbers then declined steadily until he “bottomed out” around 100 yards per game. Since then his numbers have varied between 500 and 700 (100 and 140 YPG). But recently we see his numbers have returned to the 780 range, the highest he’s been since early in his career.In short, Elliott is currently as productive as he’s ever been in his Hall of Fame-path career. So, can Cowboys fans declare victory and assume the Dallas coaching staff has suddenly discovered the fountain of success when it comes to incorporating Zeke into the passing game. Anything but. First, this is five games; a small sample size. The chart above changes pretty dramatically even from one game to the next. Teams are going to be looking at tape and figuring out how to stop Zeke from getting those 50 receiving yards per game. In fact, a breakdown of the situations those yards have come in reveal some interesting insights. I tracked every Elliott reception over the last five weeks and segmented them by down. I also graded each play as a “success” or “failure” based on the following:1st down: gained 40% of yards needed for a first down2nd down: gained 60% of yards needed for a first down3rd/4th down: gained a first downThe numbers are striking:The Cowboys have been extremely successful throwing the ball to Zeke on first down recently. On second and third down, not so much (to put it nicely). Here’s the play by play on passes to Zeke the last five games (with big plays in bold):Here’s the summary table:Summarizing:Zeke is getting more targetsHe’s catching more ballsHe’s generating more receiving yardsPassing plays to Zeke on first down are highly effective but not very successful on second and third downs.None of this, however, addresses the issue of usage. Zeke is getting targeted more often in the passing game, but he’s also still carrying the ball as much as ever. Let’s check out what Zeke’s annual numbers would be if he maintained his pace from the last five weeks:Just wow. These are eye-popping numbers:1 [url=][/url] ,700 rushing yards at a 4.9 YPC clip800 receiving yards along with six touchdownsNearly 2,500 combined yards with 16 touchdownsIn short, Zeke has been putting up numbers that would set the NFL record for yards from scrimmage (2,429 set by Marshall Faulk in 1999 during the St. Louis Rams’ Greatest Show on Turf era). However, he’d also be entering rarefied air in terms of usage. Zeke has been averaging 21 rushing attempts and 6.5 catches during this period (27.2 touches) which translates to 435 touches in a season. That would rank 12th in NFL history:There’s a widespread belief that a running back with such a heavy workload is never the same again. You can read about these ideas here, here, here and here. Summarizing, here’s the key point:Now this cites number of carries, but further research has shown that whether counting carries or touches the results are similar. This isn’t as simple as it looks however. The list above includes a number of players who, after the year cited, continued to be elite-level players for years. Fans of Emmitt Smith, LaDainian Tomlinson, Edgerrin James and Eric Dickerson weren’t complaining about a decline in production. You can read a stronger rebuttal to the “curse of 370” here (bringyour slide rule). Regardless of whether you believe the curse or not, asking your unquestioned best offensive player to carry such a load is probably unsustainable. Meaning, while this production has fueled the current win streak - and it’s fun as heck to watch - it’s not necessarily the best long-term answer for the Cowboys’ fortunes. It is a positive development, however, that Zeke is now being used in a variety of ways that makes him more difficult to defend. That should be a positive as the team moves into December and (hopefully) January. Bonus analysisDallas Cowboys’ fans have been spoiled by having four All-Pro-caliber quarterbacks (Don Meredith, Roger Staubach, Troy Aikman and Tony Romo) along with a bevy of elite-level running backs.I wondered how Zeke’s current season compares to past great seasons from great Cowboy running backs. The first question: is Zeke’s load bigger than it has been for past Dallas Cowboys’ greats (note all numbers are pro-rated to each player playing a 16-game schedule):And the answer is no. DeMarco Murray and Emmitt Smith both had seasons with more touches. Looking at it from a share of yards/touches perspective:Notes:DeMarco Murray’s 2014 season was bananas. He handled the ball on more than 50% of the Cowboys’ offensive plays.Check out Herschel Walker’s 1987 season: 42% of the team’s yards on 35% of the team’s touches. Emmitt Smith’s greatness is confirmed: five straight seasons where he generated more than 35% of the team’s offense and handled the ball more than 39% of the team’s plays. The following are all provided simply for reference and because I like comparing the great Cowboys’ against each other:Elliott’s yards per attempt numbers in both 2016, 2017 and 2018 are higher than any Cowboys’ running back with at least 1,200 yards other than Emmitt Smith’s best season (1995) and DeMarco Murray’s record-setting season (2014). Ezekiel Elliot is also younger than any of the other players shown here except for Emmitt Smith during his second season in the league (1991). Elliott is also on pace for the most receiving yards by a Cowboys’ running back since Herschel Walker’s 1987 season, when he tallied 953 yards. Cowboys’ running backs with more than 500 receiving yards in a season:Herschel Walker: Walker’s numbers make you wonder what he could have done in the modern NFL with the spread formations and benevolent passing rules. Not hard to envision him being a perennial 2,000 player during his prime. Also, how about Tom Landry being one of the first coaches to develop a dual-threat running back. A true pioneer.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Anti-Spam Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum